There are TWO cords
[1] there is the extension cord with a multiplug on the end - which can stretch around the room some places - and we see that in the photograph.
[2] there is the cord from the plug to the fan.
During cross-examination, it was put to OP that had he moved the fan to foot of the bed then the multiplug would also have been dragged further along the carpet as a result (dragging through the cord [2]). Meaning, it must afterwards have been moved back by the police. It would be another item that the police need to have moved.
However, there was subsequently somehow an issue about the length of the cord to the multiplug [1] which came up much much later in trial.
That is what provoked the request from the defence to find it and measure it's length
However in Roux's headers, he's suggested that Nel put false questions to OP and therefore confused him, but the only questions Nel put to OP concerned the cord [2] and the dragging of the multiplug. They did not, at that time, concern [1] the overall length of the cord to the multiplug itself.
Everything clear now???
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=74142866&postcount=8889
the reason why the length of the extension cord wasn't relevant was because if OP had pulled the fan to where the duvet was, the extension cord wouldn't have pulled forwards and then moved back under the bedside table again if the fan was then moved back to the door by police.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=74142896&postcount=8896
Thanks to Mr Roux. Wissen wir doch jetzt, wie verlogen der Rest der Welt und was für ein guter Mensch Oscar ist. Möge es so etwas wie ein "jüngstes Gericht" geben, wo beide die Gelegenheit bekommen, Reeva gegenüberzutreten. :engel:Interested schrieb:Was hat Roux hier heute getan? Er hat alle der Lüge bezichtigt und seinem Ozzy most probability zugesprochen bei all his versions.
Roux: if you give Fresco indemnity, you say his evidence was good. But it’s for the state to decide to prosecute. BBWäre ja jetzt der Hammer, wenn Fresco angklagt werden würde und Oscar damit freikommt. Anscheinend wird die Richterin ihn noch einmal vorladen.
Roux doesn’t recommend giving Fresco indemnity - he lied about the most crucial part: taking blame. BB
Alex Crawford@AlexCrawfordSkyJa, die Dame ist wirklich neutral.....:)
OscarPistorius family is delighted the way things have gone today comparing the two lawyers as "mercedes versus a fiat'
Ja, habe ich auch so im Gedächtnis!KlaraFall schrieb:Aber es gab doch diese sms wo Oscar an Reeva schrieb, dass Fresco die Verantwortung übernommen hat.
Their arrogance and self importance know no bounds.
Hasn't Nel won pretty much every case against Roux that the two were involved in?
Uncle A should remember the Fiat Group owns Ferrari and that's the engine that lies under Nel's bonnet, one with plenty of poke!
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=74143169&postcount=8921
Emotionales Finale
Am Ende, sagt Verteidiger Roux, würden in diesem Prozess einige Sekunden im Leben des Angeklagten entscheiden. Jene Sekunden, in denen er sich mit gezückter Waffe der verschlossenen Toilettentür in seinem Haus näherte. Betrachtet man Pistorius in dieser Situation als "vernünftige Person" im Sinne des Gesetzes, lässt also die tiefe Furcht außen vor, unter der der Angeklagte litt: "Wäre es für diese Person falsch, sich zu bewaffnen? Wäre es falsch, sich der Gefahr zu nähern, um sie vom Schlafzimmer fernzuhalten?" Und dann, als diese Person vor der Toilettentür stand: "Hätte er abdrücken sollen? Ja oder nein?" Mit dieser emotionalen Kaskade rhetorischer Fragen geht das ausführliche Plädoyer der Verteidigung zu Ende. Roux fordert einen Freispruch für seinen Mandanten.
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/plaedoyer-im-prozess-gegen-oscar-pistorius-dann-muss-das-gericht-ihn-freisprechen-1.2081910
