@Taln.Reich @clubmaster @derpreusse 
Taln.Reich schrieb:Ashert glaubt ja immer noch, dass sich nach dem Krieg die ganzen Rebellen zusammensetzen und die Demokratie einführen...
Er hat ein komisches Demokratieverständnis:
Beitrag von Ashert001 (Seite 830)Es hat gar keinen Sinn, auf ihn einzugehen, es ist zu blöd, was er alles rauslässt.
clubmaster schrieb:Sunniten haben kein Recht Syrien zu einem Shariastaat umzubauen in dem die erste Amtshandlung Massenmorde an Minderheiten sind, merk dir das mal.
Die Kämpfer unter schwarzen Flaggen sind nicht "normale" Sunniten, es sind gehirngewaschte Djihadkämpfer , mehr oder weniger radikal, islamistisch, salafistisch..zu deren "demokratischen Ummah" wollen die wenigsten Muslime gehören.
"The new face of the Syrian rebellion
..
The FSA come back, a moment to question
After this revendicated-islamist organisations panorama, salafis to moderates, we should consider the Free Syrian Army come back. But not a good come back. Because FSA is now doing what islamists did in the early last year. Far to be back in a unified army dream, organized by fronts (north, south, east…), we are observing an explosion of coalitions. And some in the same governorate. It’s the case for the Syrian Revolutionaries Front (SRF) and the Hazzm movement, in Idlib governorate. The first is led by Jamal Maarouf and Qassem Saaedine, with a contest on FSA Syrian Military Council leadership. The second was launched by the SMC leader himself, General Selim Idriss, on January 26 of this year. Both are engaged in military campaigns since last weeks (Khan Shaykhun, International Road, …). Both fighting in same areas but not allied.
..
FSA is not gaining this game until now
In conclusion, the FSA come back can be questioned on its real military impact as political influence. As the Islamic Front is transforming itself into an umbrella-style organisation, all new islamist coalitions are giving arguments to see that, in fact, the islamist side isn’t down. No. Contrary to this statement, the islamist side is more and more coordinated, organized and strong. And the loser in Syria, except for southern part of the country, is FSA. All new FSA fronts and coalitions seen are only FSA-linked brigades and battalions who were still acting under FSA name. More important, some former FSA-style brigades are now part clearly, since three months, of Ajnad al-Islam in Damascus or Jaysh al Mujahideen in Aleppo, both organisations with important salafi parts.
"
http://the-arab-chronicle.com/new-face-syrian-rebellion/ (Archiv-Version vom 25.04.2014)"The problem with this feel-good story about these supposedly moderate rebels is that its central assertion, that the new group has nothing to do with the al Qaeda-affiliated Al Nusrah Front and its allies, is simply not true.
As we pointed out the other day, Al Nusrah and its frequent battle partner, the large Islamist coalition the Islamic Front, have been very active in the south recently as well as in other key provinces across the country. See Threat Matrix report, The shadowy flow of US weapons into Syria, which notes that Al Nusrah and the Islamic Front unleashed an offensive in April in the southern province of Deraa to unite territories they hold in Deraa and Quneitra.
..
What we are seeing, and will continue to see, is Western-backed units fighting alongside Islamist fighters from Al Nusrah and the Islamic Front, and these allegedly moderate units are increasingly being supplied with heavy weapons. Accompanying these developments is a parallel campaign in the Western news media that seeks to emphasize the presence of moderate Syrian rebel groups.
Be prepared to digest similar stories in the coming days and weeks as the West, anxious to find ways to justify the provision of further support to the rebels, continues to roll out new "moderate" rebel groups sanitized of the taint of al Qaeda and extremist links. In that vein, the Washington Post reported on April 27 about a recent change in US policy allowing the delivery of US-made antitank missiles via "friends of Syria" to vetted groups such as the Harakat Hazm.
An article in Foreign Policy yesterday mentioned that the CIA, which is in charge of providing weapons to Syrian rebel groups, is looking into incorporating technological devices such as fingerprint scanners into the weapons to make sure they remain in the hands of vetted groups and not those of Islamist fighters.
"
http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/archives/2014/05/the_problem_with_this_feel-goo.php@kickboxer187 
kickboxer187 schrieb:Woher kommen diese ganzen Terroristen? Welche Bildung bzw. Welche Kultur prägt diese Menschen so sehr das sie morden, meucheln und Andersdenkende töten?
Ich kann das nicht verstehen. Es ist nicht die Religion des Islams an sich, ja aber was bewegt diese Menschen zu diesen Gräueltaten. Woher bekommen sie ihren halt und Finanzierung und Waffen um das zu tun was sie tun? Was wollen sie erreichen?
Gute Frage, denke sind sich selber nicht einig, wie genau ihr Kalifat und deren Sharia funktionieren soll, darum die internen Schwierigkeiten!
Woher sie unterstützt sind weiss man, umso unverständlicher ist es, dass sie Anhänger haben,
in Länder in Unsicherheit und Armut lassen sich die leicht rekrutieren,
wie aber hier Jugendliche angezogen werden können ist schwer verständlich. Funktionieren wie eine Sekte die Gut/Böse klar definiert und alles vorgibt, wie man zu leben und denken hat.
gemeinsame Motivation ist Hass auf Anders-denkende/Gläubige.
Wie hier Leute auf solche Seiten von Salafigruppen reinfallen ist mir unbegreiflich!
http://www.ahlu-sunnah.com/threads/45721-Syrien-Ahrar-al-Sham/page193 (Archiv-Version vom 15.08.2014)
