Misuteri schrieb am 11.07.2017:Also: ist er als Einzeltäter verurteilt worden oder allgemein als "Täter / Helfer im Haysom-Fall"?
Müsste er trotzdem weiter im Gefängnis bleiben, weil man sagt, er war ja irgendwie dabei (auch wenn er z.B. nicht zugestochen hat oder nur allgemein geholfen hat)?
Oder käme er frei, weil die Tat anders ablief als im Prozess gesagt (obwohl er evtl. dabei war oder geholfen hat)?
welche neuen Erkenntnisse sollten es denn sein? Die DNA, die 2009 untersucht wurde, und aus Versehen übersehen wurde, dass die Blutgruppe 0 und die Blutruppe A die selbe DNA aufweist? Das ist, wie der ganze Fall, eine Farce. Er hat doch überhaupt nichts aufzuweisen.
Ich glaube seine einzige Chance rauszukommen ist, wenn es bewiesen ist, das die gefundenen Blutspuren definitiv nicht von ihm sind.
Der Grad der Gestörtheithttp://www.eugrz.info/PDF/EGMR4/EGMR04-27.pdf
von Frl. Haysom grenzt an Psychose, und sie war im Laufe vieler Monate
fähig, Soering zu überzeugen, dass er ihre Eltern töten müsse, damit sie
und er als Paar überleben könnten
Wenn es so etwas überhaupt gibt.
Soering, who drove to Bedford in his new Volkswagen Scirocco, a car he had ordered in February. (Albemarle 1989)Was die durchaus berechtigte Frage aufwirft, warum die beiden dann nicht gewartet haben:
And had they waited for Jens' Volkswagen to arrive, there would have been no rental car mileage record to foil their plan. (Albemarle 1989)Das stellt sich natürlich die Frage, wie geplant, wie spontan das alles war. Elizabeth stand kurz vor ihrem 21. Geburtstag - offenbar hätte sie dann Zugriff auf ein Sparbuch - wenn ihre Eltern da noch am Leben gewesen wären.
With the possibility of a large savings account just three weeks away, Elizabeth had more to gain with her parents alive for her 21st birthday. (Albemarle 1989)Englade spricht glaub ich nur allgemein von einem Konto, dass an ihrem Geburtstag eingerichtet werden sollte.
"as far as the acts themselves, I don't think she planned all that out. It was like 'Double-Dare You,'" (Albemarle 1989)Andererseits sah das bei Elizabeth auch tatsächlich eher nach spontaner Tat aus, da ja weder Kinokarten noch Quittungen gefunden wurden -
Indeed, investigators had found no movie tickets among the co-defendants' numerous mementos. The pair had not saved the room-service receipt with the $35.11 charge suggesting two meals might have been ordered the night of March 30. (Albemarle 1989)- die hatte Sörings Vater aufbewahrt und tauchten erst Jahre später bei Sörings Prozess wieder auf.
Haysom and Soering were charged with conspiring to defraud Lloyd's Bank, Midland Bank, and anyone else who thought their checks were valid. In addition to "pulling refunds" at Marks & Spencer, they had purchased traveler's checks in Dover, nipping across the channel to France to report them stolen, then traveling by train to Belgium to cash them. And with the help of a single prop — an RSPCA collection box — they had gone door to door to the tune of another £60 or so. Their total take had been about 59,000. It was all in the diary.@ligala Sind die Alias-Namen nicht ähnlich toll wie die der Isdal-Frau? :-)
The two had traveled to Bangkok, where they had special-ordered 100 blank identification cards and several rubber stamps. Once back in England, they made the rounds of universities surrounding London, opening student checking accounts under false names. Elizabeth had many aliases: Julia Alexandra Holte, Caroline Jane Ferrell, Catherine Lynne Peake, Melissa Anne Tayler, Christina May Clarke. Sarah Elizabeth McKensie.
Marks & Spencer's no-argument cash refund policy is widely known in Great Britain, and the many stores in the metropolitan area are easily accessible by underground or bus. Acting quickly, the couple devised a schedule whereby they could cover the most stores in the shortest amount of time without ever repeating a disguise.
The pair had flown to Europe separately, arranging to rendezvous in Paris on the Champs Elysees. then apparenllv renting a car they intended to drive to Turkey and sell; an auto accident altered their plan, and they went to Austria instead. Elizabeth claims Jens fancied himself a first-rate would-be "assassin," buying expensive drinks in hotel lounges and insisting they purchase matching luggage in which he packed a tuxedo, a Canon camera, and other luxury items he bought in Europe and Asia with what she says was his father's credit card. (The Soerings maintain they did not know their son's whereabouts until a few weeks after his arrest, their lawyer says; there has been speculation that the credit card belonged to Elizabeth's half- brother Veryan, but, like the Soerings, the Haysoms maintain they had no contact with their sister during this time.) Arriving in England, they came up with a plan: to carry out frauds and accumulate enough cash to start a business. (Einzelne Sätze lassen sich über diese Seite überprüfen: Albemarle Magazine 1989)
Kann man sich dieses Magazin, auch in voller Seite durchlesen ?
nicht nur das. Er ist es nicht nur gewohnt, das seine Version in den Zeitungen erscheint, sondern auch, dass EH als Lügnerin dargestellt wird. Hier hat der Journalist ihr aber mehr Glauben geschenkt, was eben untypsich ist.
Elizabeth did not speculate. She did, however, criticize local authorities for suspecting her.
[...]
In September, Elizabeth Haysom and Christine Kim moved in together as scheduled. "One of the first things she said was, 'I'm not in love with [Jens] anymore,'" but that she feared leaving him because he had threatened her, Christine recalls. Soering took a dormitory room, but was rarely there. "He sort of moved in with me." Elizabeth explains. And for privacy's sake. "I threw him out Wednesdays and Saturdays, which meant he would leave around 1 a.m. and pitch up at 6."
In early October, Bedford investigators Ricky Gardner and Charlie Reid asked to question Soering, who drove to Bedford in his new Volkswagen Scirocco, a car he had ordered in February. They offered him a cup of coffee, which he accepted. They asked him to provide physical evidence, which he refused. Elizabeth told Christine she thought Soering might have had something to do with her parents' murders. Then she told Christine she was wrong, and that it might have been some Irish terrorists she knew.
Soering began to fear that Gardner was closing in on him. The couple had considered the 29-year-old deputy a bumpkin; that he didn't know what Luxembourg was or where Cambridge was had amused them. But had Gardner been clever enough to lift Soering's fingerprints from the cup he had used in Bedford? In the second week of October, the investigators called again to ask Soering for physical evidence. This time, he said yes, but not until midterms were over. They arranged to meet at the University Police Station October 16.
"If you had to choose between self-preservation and loyalty, which would you choose" Elizabeth Haysom asked Christine Kim. "Self-preservation," Christine answered quickly. The next day, Christine wished to amend her response. "I think it would depend on the circumstances," she said. As they walked up University Avenue past the Rotunda, Christine turned onto Elliewood, saying good-bye to her friend. It was the last she would see of her for a while. (Überprüfbar hier:Albemarle Magazine 1989)
Das wäre die Frage. Ich lese das so, dass Elizabeth ihrer Mitbewohnerin glauben machen will, dass sie mit der Tat nichts zu tun habe und dass Söring der Täter sei. Unterstrichen wird das dann noch mit der Behauptung, ihn nicht mehr zu lieben (weil er ihre Eltern umgebracht hat), und dass er sie bedrohe (wie Mörder eben andere bedrohen).Bluelle schrieb: dass sie trickst und ausspielt und manipuliert.
