Der Prozess Oscar Pistorius und der Tod von Reeva Steenkamp
05.07.2014 um 20:06Anzeige
"Pistorius has also hired The Evidence Room, an American forensic animation firm based in Cleveland, Ohio, to digitally recreate the crime scene using computer animation, a craft popularized in movies such as Toy Story and Shrek."http://www.newvision.co.ug/mobile/Detail.aspx?NewsID=653008&CatID=469
Robert80 schrieb:Aber auf dem Video hatte er doch gar keine Prothesen an?Davon ist der Staat aber zuerst ausgegangen.
Retweeted by Mandy Wiener
Karyn Maughan @karynmaughan 7m
#OscarPistorius lawyers say they are investigating the alleged leaking of re-enactment footage, believed to have been sold for millions
OH NOOOO!!! Bad news. Really bad news. It appears that OP participated in the video a long time ago when the DT felt that they needed to prove that OP could go after Mr. Intruder on his stumps very easily. But now the DT is trying to paint the image of OP as the ultimate invalid with extremely limited mobility on his stumps. This is such a screw up. One thing is for certain, Nel and me are both going to enjoy Monday's court proceedings, and Roux is freaking out right this minute!
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?248672-Trial-Discussion-Thread-45-14-07-3-Day-36&p=10705541#post10705541
KlaraFall schrieb:Nel and me are both going to enjoy Monday's court proceedings, and Roux is freaking out right this minute!Könnte von mir sein! :D Justice!
tayo schrieb:Nel sollte das Video dem Professor vorspielen - für die Richterin ist es bestimmt auch sehr interessant.Ich weiss nicht, ob er das überhaupt kann.
If OP had admitted having heard zombie stopper OR would not have requested to see the video, Nel could NOT have shown it to contradict OP's statement.
I believe (but not 100% sure) that the the latest video could be used in Wayne Derman's cross-examination to get his 'expert' opinion on it.
The State cannot lead character evidence UNLESS Defence opens the door first, which they obviously have… this is why some believe that Nel could reopen the case on that basis alone… I strongly believe Nel should… I even suspect that Nel was itching for it.
DT has petitioned Masipa that the psyche reports NOT be published… now Roux has released one of them on the internet.
To me at least, this suggests that because the DT is failing miserably in the Courtroom Trial, they are now attempting to gain some headway in a Trial of public opinion.
Pathetic.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?248672-Trial-Discussion-Thread-45-14-07-3-Day-36&p=10705446#post10705446
Interested schrieb:Milady schaut sich das Video an - von mir aus auch nur diese 19 sek. - es sagt ne Menge aus ;)Vor allem sagt es aus ,dass diese Schmiervögel von der Verteidigung lügen ,dass sich die Baljen biegen und das w i d e r besseres Wissen. Das zum Thema ,was eine Person mal behauptete ,das dies dem Verteidiger untersagt sei und daher hier unwahrscheinlich. Das kommt natürlich in "Schland" auch vor. Aber es zeigt ,wie s k r u p e l l o s Oldwage und Roux offenbar sind ,das typische stereotype Antibild des Strafverteidigers ,der für ein paar Kröten auch den Mafia Boss raushaut. Ich finde das abstossend . Zumindest nach dem deutschen Rechtsverständnis des Strafverteidigers sollte es so nicht gemacht werden ,obwohl es natürlich genug schwarze Schafe gibt--- weiss natürlich nicht ,ob das in SA anders ist ,dass der lawyer da obwohl besser informiert lügen darf.