@Africanus
Africanus schrieb am 28.03.2015:Tja, leider ist die Realität anders als Deine Wunschvorstellung, Oswald wurde bei einer Gegenüberstellung von Howard Brennan identifiziert.
Er war sich also sicher !
Und wie oft hat er seine Meinung geändert ?
Brennan, however, turned out to be unreliable and unhelpful:
He claimed that the gunman had been standing up when firing, although the half–open window required any gunman to have crouched or kneeled.
He claimed to have seen the gunman’s trousers, which would not have been visible from Brennan’s viewpoint on the street sixty feet below.
When asked whether he had actually seen the firing of the rifle, he replied, “No.”
He claimed that on hearing the first shot, “I looked up at the building. I then saw this man I have described in the window and he was taking aim with a high powered rifle. I could see all of the barrel of the gun.” Brennan’s reaction to the first shot is visible on the Zapruder film: standing directly opposite the sixth–floor window, he watches Kennedy’s car go past him to his left, then from about frame 204 he in fact turns his head sharply to his right, away from the TSBD, rather than up toward the sixth floor.
He failed to pick out Oswald at an identification parade, despite already having seen Oswald’s picture on television.13
Two witnesses, Arnold Rowland and Amos Euins, saw a man on the sixth floor, holding a rifle, who did not resemble Oswald.14 Rowland saw the gunman a few minutes before the shooting, when Oswald’s alibi almost certainly places him on the first floor, a location which is consistent with his encounter with the policeman and the building supervisor.
sunlay schrieb:Und ich kann für mich immer nachhaltiger beantworten, warum manche hier gerade im Zapruderfilm den fatalen Headshot mit einer Schützenposition von ausschließlich hinten vereinbaren. Einbildung. Ihr wollt es so haben.
