Der Plan für eine Massenverdummung
28.09.2010 um 20:39Anzeige
Doors schrieb:Verblödet sind immer die anderen. Gut, dass wenigstens WIR das durchschauen. Die anderen sind schliesslich alle zu blöd dazu. Wird also Zeit, dass WIR darüber bestimmen, was andere zu lesen und zu sehen, zu hören und zu denken haben, dass WIR über die ganzen Doofen bestimmen. Guter demokratischer Ansatz. Wie vom Bilderberg herab gestiegen.Gefällt mir
Doors schrieb:Verblödet sind immer die anderen. Gut, dass wenigstens WIR das durchschauen. Die anderen sind schliesslich alle zu blöd dazu. Wird also Zeit, dass WIR darüber bestimmen, was andere zu lesen und zu sehen, zu hören und zu denken haben, dass WIR über die ganzen Doofen bestimmen. Guter demokratischer Ansatz. Wie vom Bilderberg herab gestiegen.Das riecht dann zu sehr nach "Zwangsmissionieren" :D
ruhigermieter schrieb:Und alle denken, mit wichtigem Geschreibsel im Net könnte man was ändern...Alle denken, ihre persönliche kleine Welt und Sichtweise ist die einzig Richtige ;)
gorgon schrieb:Dumm nur, dass die angesprochene Fliege von ihrer Natur aus her die menschlicheDumm nur, dass sich sehr viele Menschen genau so verhalten ^^
Scheibe als solche gar nicht kennt bzw. kennen kann und nur deshalb nichts mit ihr
anzufangen weiß.
just_dust schrieb:alle Medienreporte und alle Zeitschriften sind beeinflusst und wurden von ganz oben abgesegnet!!Was genau meinst Du damit?
A DIALOGUE WITH SARAH, AGED 3: IN WHICH IT IS SHOWN THAT IF YOUR DAD IS A CHEMISTRY PROFESSOR, ASKING “WHY” CAN BE DANGEROUShttp://www.scq.ubc.ca/a-dialogue-with-sarah-aged-3-in-which-it-is-shown-that-if-your-dad-is-a-chemistry-professor-asking-%E2%80%9Cwhy%E2%80%9D-can-be-dangerous-2/ (Archiv-Version vom 29.09.2010)
By Stephen McNeil
- FROM THE ARCHIVES -
SARAH: Daddy, were you in the shower?
DAD: Yes, I was in the shower.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: I was dirty. The shower gets me clean.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why does the shower get me clean?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: Because the water washes the dirt away when I use soap.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why do I use soap?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: Because the soap grabs the dirt and lets the water wash it off.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why does the soap grab the dirt?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: Because soap is a surfactant.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why is soap a surfactant?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: That is an EXCELLENT question. Soap is a surfactant because it forms water-soluble micelles that trap the otherwise insoluble dirt and oil particles.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why does soap form micelles?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: Soap molecules are long chains with a polar, hydrophilic head and a non-polar, hydrophobic tail. Can you say ‘hydrophilic’?
SARAH: Aidrofawwic
DAD: And can you say ‘hydrophobic’?
SARAH: Aidrofawwic
DAD: Excellent! The word ‘hydrophobic’ means that it avoids water.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why does it mean that?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: It’s Greek! ‘Hydro’ means water and ‘phobic’ means ‘fear of’. ‘Phobos’ is fear. So ‘hydrophobic’ means ‘afraid of water’.
SARAH: Like a monster?
DAD: You mean, like being afraid of a monster?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: A scary monster, sure. If you were afraid of a monster, a Greek person would say you were gorgophobic.
(pause)
SARAH: (rolls her eyes) I thought we were talking about soap.
DAD: We are talking about soap.
(longish pause)
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why do the molecules have a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: Because the C-O bonds in the head are highly polar, and the C-H bonds in the tail are effectively non-polar.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Because while carbon and hydrogen have almost the same electronegativity, oxygen is far more electronegative, thereby polarizing the C-O bonds.
SARAH: Why?
DAD: Why is oxygen more electronegative than carbon and hydrogen?
SARAH: Yes.
DAD: That’s complicated. There are different answers to that question, depending on whether you’re talking about the Pauling or Mulliken electronegativity scales. The Pauling scale is based on homo- versus heteronuclear bond strength differences, while the Mulliken scale is based on the atomic properties of electron affinity and ionization energy. But it really all comes down to effective nuclear charge. The valence electrons in an oxygen atom have a lower energy than those of a carbon atom, and electrons shared between them are held more tightly to the oxygen, because electrons in an oxygen atom experience a greater nuclear charge and therefore a stronger attraction to the atomic nucleus! Cool, huh?
(pause)
SARAH: I don’t get it.
DAD: That’s OK. Neither do most of my students.