Thermite das Supi Dupi Wunderpulver!
50 - 100 Kilo hätte gereicht um die WTC Türmeeinstürzen zu lassen.
Das behaupten zumindest die VTler^^
Note how muchthermite is used. The pot is about a liter, but how much thermite is that?
Stoichiometric thermite requires 2 moles of Al per 1 mole of Fe2O3
2Al + Fe2O3= Al2O3 + 2Fe
2 moles of Al weigh 54 g
1 mole of Fe2O3 weighs 160g
density of Al=2.64 g/cc
density of Fe2O3=5.24 g/cc
54grams of Al is equivalent to 20.5 cc of Al.
160g of Fe2O3 is equivalent to 30.5 ccof Fe2O3
Therefore, 51 cc of fully dense powder of 20.5 cc Al and 30.5 ccFe2O3 weighs (54+160) g = 214 g.
A volume of 1000 cc would weigh (1000/51)*214= 4.2 kg
For a powder packing density of 50%, the powder would weigh:
0.5*4.2 kg = 2.1 kg = 4.8 lb
That much just to burn a small hole in a small carengine. I bet it's even an aluminum block but lets say it isn't. How much do you think itwould take to burn a massive core column? Then add enough to burn for 6 weeks! You seewhere we're going. You'd need tons.
Here's a Debunking911 Fun Fact!
Howmuch mass would be required to produce molten iron from thermite equal to the same volumeof molten aluminum droplets shown flowing from the south tower window:
Amole of Fe weighs 54 g. For every mole of Fe produced by thermite, one mole of Al and 0.5mole of Fe2O3 is needed.
2Al + Fe2O3 = Al2O3 + 2Fe
One mole ofAl weighs 27 g. 0.5 mole of Fe2O3 weighs 80 g.
Therefore, (27 + 80) g = 107 gof Al and Fe2O3 is needed to produce 54 g of Fe.
That means the mass of thereactants to that of Fe produced is a ratio of 107/54 = 2. The mass of thermite reactants(Al, Fe2O3) is twice that of the molten iron produced.
Comparing the weight ofmolten aluminum droplets compared with iron:
Iron is 7.9 g/cc. Aluminum is2.64 g/cc. Fe is denser than Al by a factor of 3. For the same volume of droplets, Fewould have three times the mass as Al.
To produce the iron from thermiterequires a reactant mass that is a factor of 2 more than the iron produced. Also, Fe is 3times as dense as Al. So, it would take 2*3 = 6 times as much mass to produce the samevolume of molten iron droplets from thermite compared with molten aluminumdroplets.
Assume 3000 lbs of aluminum fell from thetowers. If it had been molten iron produced by thermite, then 6*3000 = 18,000 lbs ofthermite reactants would have been required to produce that same volume of fallingmass.
Suppose 10 tons of molten aluminum fell from the south tower, about1/8th of that available from the airplane. If it had been molten iron produced fromthermite, 60 tons of thermite reactants would have to have been stored in Fuji Bank toproduce the same volume spilling out of the south tower. The section of floor would haveto hold all of that plus the aircraft.
*Amount of aluminum can be ascertainedby counting the droplets and measuring their size compared to the known size of thewindow. It's not easy to get a good number on this. It's based on the number of slugsseen in video stills, their size relative to the window width which was about 22 inches,and the density of aluminum, assuming this was aluminum. http://www.coolmagnetman.com/magconda.htm
The weight of a gallon of aluminumis about 22.5 pounds. A hundred of these would already be 2250 lbs. A gallon size is notunlike the size of the slugs that were pouring out the window. Look at them relative tothe window size. They look small at first, but when you realize how big the towers were,the slugs were fairly large. It must have been in the thousands of pounds.
hethermite wouldn't have only needed to make a clean cut like the photo above, it wouldhave also needed to cut sideways. Not an easy feat for thermite. You see, it's a powderwhich burns chaotically. Maybe with some device but no working device has been proven tome to work to cut a vertical column. You can direct it with a canister but that methodwouldn't work to cut a column. The canister only makes a small hole. Nano-thermite hasbeen talked about but its uses fall far short of cutting these massive columns. It's inits research stage. They include possible uses for welding molecular devices andpossible use as a heat signature flare decoy. Then there is a patent of a device whichhas been brought up but as of yet, there is no evidence the idea went any further. Doesit even work? Even if it did, they are "Ganged" together to make the cut. You would stillneed these boxes all over the columns. Once again the answer to this from the "scholars"is "rationalized technology". They need this technology to exist so it exists. There issome secret super thermite which can be placed in a canister which can survive 1,100degree C so the primary charge doesn't go off. "Gee debunking, you're sodumb."