@ups @flanagan @Smoover Cherrypicking?
Kann eure Argumentationsstruktur grad nicht nachvollziehen. Es geht nicht darum, wer den Bericht bezahlt hat, es geht darum :
Quarks schrieb:Nist hat geschönigt und manipuliert, da sie mitunter gar keinen freien und objektiven Zugang zu allen notwendigen Orginalmaterialen hatten, was sie selbst zugeben. (mitunter auch gewollt - ist meine Meinung) Eine übliche Untersuchung, wie sie sonst bei Szenarien wie Flugzeugabstürzen oder Einstürzen stattfindet, gab es nicht und konnte es somit nicht geben.
Entschuldige bitte meine Skepsis. Ist ja auch nur MEINE Meinung. Jeder darf glauben was er möchte.
Auch sollte man sich überlegen, wieviel Einfluss die Regierung auf die Untersuchungskommision ausübte. Mitunter durch Interessenkonflikte und auch gewollter und bewusst geschaffener politscher Konsens.
"Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, believe that the government established the Commission in a way that ensured that it would fail"
Wikipedia: Criticism of the 9/11 CommissionAus einem Interview mit Lee Hamilton (911 Comission) :
Solomon: You write.. the first chapter of the book is 'the Commission was set up to fail.' - my goodness, for the critics - who suggest that it was indeed set up to fail as some kind of obfuscation - you certainly dangled a juicy piece of bait out there in the river. Why do you think you were set up to fail?
Hamilton: Well, for a number of reasons: Tom Kean and I were substitutes - Henry Kissinger and George Mitchell were the first choices; we got started late; we had a very short time frame - indeed, we had to get it extended; we did not have enough money - 3 million dollars to conduct an extensive investigation. We needed more, we got more, but it took us a while to get it.
We had a lot of skeptics out there, who really did not want the Commission formed. Politicians don’t like somebody looking back to see if they made a mistake.
The Commission had to report right, just a few days before the Democratic National Convention met, in other words, right in the middle of a political campaign. We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people. We knew the history of commissions; the history of commissions were they.. nobody paid much attention to 'em.
So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail. We decided that if we were going to have any success, we had to have a unanimous report, otherwise the Commission report would simply be filed.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070108233707/http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.htmlGrüße
Johncom schrieb:Stimmt, aber es zeigt dem Kommisar auf, in welche Richtung es zu ermitteln geht. Im Falle des Anschlags auf den Pentagon und auf die 3 Türme könnte der Verdacht erwogen werden, dass die Getroffenen sowieso den War on Terror vorhatten.
