Oscar Pistorius, das Model, der Valentinstag und das war dann Notwehr17.04.2014 um 22:17
Ist es möglich, dass sie auf Grund der kurzen Zeit keinen crosscheck gemacht haben? Anders kann ich esmir nicht erklären.
Interested schrieb:ch nenne es The Dixon Adventure Tour to Court...full of suprises, lot's of headshakes and facepalms...Join in. Our pleasure to entertain you :DDamit hat wohl keiner gerechnet.
Oscar Pistorius' Own Expert Witness Contradicts Him
Rabenfeder schrieb:Der Link zu Inge Lotz und Dixon ist interessant, da hat er wohl auch schon einige kleineGanz offensichtlich.
"The Lotz murder remains one of the country’s most puzzling mysteries."Vielleicht findet sich in der Pause etwas Zeit da mal näher hinzuschauen?!!
Watched the videos below. This is what I found here:"Yes, and now combine this with OP's testimony in which he described how the first hit put a small hole in the door through which he could see Reeva.
All in the first 3 minutes of the video above.
Roux: Colonel, just before the adjournment you explained the basis why you testified that the shots were fired first and then it was the cricket bat hitting the door and you specifically referred to the crack that run down into the hole and then down into a different place.
Vermeulen: That's correct, my lady, and I just quickly draw (sic) this diagram on this piece of paper here to show you what I'm referring to. If you look at the bullet hole on the furthest to the right, I hope it's visible from there, but there's a crack coming into the bullet hole, or a piece of wood that broke, and..uh..the breakage was into the bullet hole on the right hand side of the bullet hole and then the crack goes out on the left hand side of the bullet hole and that is why I said the bullet hole was there before the panel was broken. Because if it was the other way around the crack would have been in a straight line. It happened like this (pointing to the diagram) because of the bullet hole that the crack going down initiated in a different position.
Roux talks about the defense which will present evidence that it was first the shooting then the hitting of the bat and the breaking of the door. He asks Vermeulen if that would be his evidence as well.
Vermeulen: (2:35 on video above)
For that specific crack? Yes, my lady, it was after the firing of the bullets took place, yes, my lady.
Then the next day Nel is back in this video:
Time on video: 12:50 - 13:50.
Nel: Now, Colonel, I took a specific note of an answer you gave yesterday to Adv. Roux pertaining to what happened first the shots or the bat. You said the bullet hole was there before the panel was broken?
Vermeulen: That's correct, my lady.
Nel: (Looking at the bat marks on the door) Can you say scientifically, if we take the first mark, if that was caused before the shots were fired?
Vermeulen: (Looks at the door for a few seconds.) My lady, scientifically I would not think that it would be possible to say whether that small mark..if I'm correct you're referring to that small mark there (points at door with laser to mark above door handle) on the side I would not be able to say that it was there before the shots were fired, no.