JFK - Attentataufdeckung
02.02.2017 um 10:31Anzeige
EC145 schrieb:Ist Specter nicht derjenige der auch die Magic Bullet erfunden hat ?Ich halte "erfunden" für das völlig falsche Wort, es basiert auf Aussagen etc. Die Befragten waren sich halt nicht zu 100% sicher.
Aniara schrieb:Die Befragten waren sich halt nicht zu 100% sicher.Dr. Finck z. B. war sich zu 100% sicher, daß es sich nicht um die Magic (Single) Bullet handeln konnte.
Aniara schrieb:1964 haben Wright und Tomlinson ausgesagt, dass es sich bei der gefundenen Kugel, um dieselbe handeln könnte, die auf dem stretcher gefunden wurde. Sie waren sich halt nur nicht zu 100 % sicher.Bitte hör doch endlich auf, hier Falschinformationen zu verbreiten!
Chain of evidenceWikipedia: Single-bullet theory
Some critics have questioned the circumstances surrounding the bullet's discovery at Parkland Hospital. In a 1966 interview with author Josiah Thompson, one of the men who found the bullet, Parkland personnel director O.P. Wright, cast doubt on whether the bullet subsequently entered into evidence as CE 399 was the same bullet he held in his hand that day. Wright told Thompson that the bullet they found was point nosed, whereas CE 399 is round nosed.[114] However, in 1964, both Wright and Darrel Tomlinson, a maintenance employee at Parkland who passed the bullet along to Wright, were shown the bullet and said the bullet in evidence appeared to be the same one as the bullet found on the stretcher, though neither could positively identify the bullet as the same one.
Lambach schrieb:Abgesehen davon daß Wikipedia hier falsche Angaben machtDann korrigiere es doch und wir sehen, ob die Änderung durch geht. Nur zu, jeder darf Wikipedia ändern, auch du.
Aniara schrieb:Nur zu, jeder darf Wikipedia ändern, auch du.Das interessiert mich nicht, denn Wiki halte ich bei Verschwörungstheorien für keine besonders gute Quelle. Da sitzen die OTler wie die Glucken drauf, daß nur ja nicht allzuviel "interessante" Informationen in die Artikel fließen.
Aniara schrieb:Puh, das ist mir jetzt zu weit weg von dem Thema, was ich hier eigentlich klären wollte und was ja auch mittlerweile längst geklärt wurde, leicht suggestive Fragen etc.Lol - es ist genau das Thema, das du klären wolltest. Aber wenn die größte Lüge im Warren Report für dich ohnehin nur ein "winziges Detail" ist und du eine Lüge Specters nicht unter manipulativem Verhalten verbuchst, dann ist es ohnehin egal wie weit weg du von einem Thema bist. ;)
Lambach schrieb:Da sitzen die OTler wie die Glucken drauf, daß nur ja nicht allzuviel "interessante" Information in die Artikel fließen.Ich warte auf deine Korrektur, wenn du passende Quellen hast, dann werden auch deine Korrekturen akzeptiert. Ich bin gespannt, trau dich. ;)
Lambach schrieb:Auf welches Posting beziehst du dich nun - auf das von sunlay?Ja, natürlich, auf welches denn sonst?
Lambach schrieb:Ich hab dir doch das Interview mit Tomlinson schon ca. eine Million Mal verlinkt. Und dir auch die Stelle gezeigt:Sorry, da habe ich die Namen durcheinander gebracht, ich meinte Jimison.
Mr. TOMLINSON. Well, today or any other day, I'm just not sure of it, whether it was A or B that I took off.Bevor Spector Tomlinson befragt hat, haben ihn schon Sercret Service und FBI befragt.
@Africanus
@Aniara
@EC145
@LambachOne of the best kept secrets of the Commission was that all of its members were not on board with the Single Bullet Theory. In fact, as we know today, there was at least one member who was not ready to sign off on the report unless certain objections were in the record. The man who made these objections was Sen. Richard Russell. Sen. John S. Cooper and Rep. Hale Boggs quietly supported him behind the scenes. These three not only had problems with ballistics evidence, they also questioned the FBI version of just who Lee and Marina Oswald actually were. Russell was so disenchanted with the proceedings that he actually wrote a letter of resignation-which he did not send-and he commissioned his own private inquiry. (Reclaiming Parkland, p. 258) Realizing that Russell was going to demand certain objections be entered into the record at the final meeting, Rankin and Warren did something extraordinarily deceitful. They stage-managed a presentation that featured a female secretary there; but she was not from the official stenography company, Ward and Paul. (McKnight, p. 294) She was, in essence, an actress. Therefore, there is no actual transcript of this meeting where Russell voiced his reservations. This fact was kept from Russell until 1968. Then researcher Harold Weisberg discovered it. When he alerted Russell to this internal trickery, the senator became the first commissioner to openly break ranks with his cohorts and question what they had done. (ibid, pgs. 296-97) Russell was later joined by Boggs and Cooper. Hale Boggs was quite vocal about the cover-up instituted by Hoover. He said that "Hoover lied his eyes out to the Commission." (Reclaiming Parkland, p. 259)https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/on-its-50th-anniversary-why-the-warren-report-today-is-inoperative?highlight=WyJzaW5nbGUiLCInc2luZ2xlIiwiYnVsbGV0IiwiYnVsbGV0J3MiLCJidWxsZXQnIiwic2luZ2xlIGJ1bGxldCJd
Dazu ist folgendes interessant:Bevor Spector Tomlinson befragt hat, haben ihn schon Sercret Service und FBI befragt. Schon in der ersten Befragung hat Tomlinson - laut eigener Aussage - gesagt, dass er sich nicht sicher ist, ob er stretcher A oder stretcher B aus dem Fahrstuhl geholt hat.
32. Arlen Specter did not show Darrell Tomlinson CE 399.https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/on-its-50th-anniversary-why-the-warren-report-today-is-inoperative?highlight=WyJzaW5nbGUiLCInc2luZ2xlIiwiYnVsbGV0IiwiYnVsbGV0J3MiLCJidWxsZXQnIiwic2luZ2xlIGJ1bGxldCJd
As we showed in Plaque 2, O. P. Wright's name is not in the Warren Report. But Arlen Specter did question Darrell Tomlinson. He was the hospital employee who recovered CE 399 and gave it to Wright. In the reports of the questioning of Tomlinson, and in his Warren Commission testimony, there is no evidence that Specter ever showed Tomlinson CE 399.IWC Vol. 6, pgs. 128-34) To say this is highly irregular is soft-pedaling it. Wright and Tomlinson are the two men who recovered CE 399 and started it on its journey to the Secret Service and then the FBI lab that night. To not ask the two men who began the chain of possession; in fact, to totally ignore one of them; to certify their exhibit is more than stunning. It invites suspicion. The next point illustrates why.
33. The Warren Commission accepted a lie by Hoover on the validity of CE 399.
This was a mistake of the first order. Because it was later discovered that the FBI fabricated evidence to cover up the falsification of CE 399. As Gary Aguilar and Josiah Thompson later discovered, the man who the FBI said got identifications of CE 399 from Wright and Tomlinson was agent Bardwell Odum. According to Commission Exhibit 2011, when Odum showed the bullet to these two hospital employees, their reply was it "appears to be the same one" but they could not "positively identify it." (The Assassinations, edited by Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease, p. 282) That in itself was a nebulous reply to an important question. But it turned out that it concealed something even worse. For when Aguilar and Thompson visited Odum and asked him about this identification, he denied it ever happened. He said he never showed any bullet to any hospital employees concerning the Kennedy assassination. And if he did he would have recalled it. Because he knew Wright and he also would have filed his own report on it. Which he did not. (ibid, p. 284)
Groucho schrieb:Bevor Spector Tomlinson befragt hat, haben ihn schon Sercret Service und FBI befragt.Das ist eigentlich auch nicht so wichtig, denn wir haben einige unumstößliche Schlüsselinformationen.
Schon in der ersten Befragung hat Tomlinson - laut eigener Aussage - gesagt, dass er sich nicht sicher ist, ob er stretcher A oder stretcher B aus dem Fahrstuhl geholt hat.
Mr. SPECTER. Was there any other stretcher placed on that elevator later that day?Jimison hatte Dienst bis 15:30 Uhr.
Mr. JIMISON. Not during my shift.
Mr. SPECTER. What time did you get off that day?Wir wissen auch, daß als Connallys Stretcher (Stretcher A) aus dem Aufzug kam, bereits ein Stretcher (Stretcher B) auf dem Gang stand und aus sunlays Quelle geht hervor, daß der eigentlich nur einem Baby namens Ronny Fuller zugeordnet werden kann, was aber nicht von entscheidender Bedeutung ist.
Mr. JIMISON. 3:30.
Mr. SPECTER. And you say there was no other stretcher placed on that elevator from the time you put Governor Connally's stretcher on until the end of the day ?
Mr. JIMISON. Until the end of my shift. You see, that's the emergency---- from the emergency that we had from that time that he was brought up until I was relieved from duty that afternoon.
Mr. SPECTER - Now, what did you do with the stretcher after Governor Connally was taken off of it?Er hatte also Tomlinson und Jimison völlig umsonst nach diesen konkreten Sachen gefragt, denn die konnten gar nicht mehr auf Connallys Stretcher drauf sein!
Miss WESTER - I moved the stretcher back to the center area, fairly close to the clock, it Wasn't right under it, but fairly close, and an orderly, R. J. Jimison, walked up---
Mr. SPECTER - His initials are R. J.?
Miss WESTER - And he stood at the cart while I rolled the sheets up and removed the items from the cart, and from there he took the cart and proceeded to the elevator with it and the last time I saw him he was standing at the elevator with the cart waiting for him to be picked up.
Mr. SPECTER. What was on the stretcher at that time?Und er hat auch bestätigt, daß das die übliche Vorgehensweise ist:
Mr. JIMISON. I noticed nothing more than a little fiat mattress and two sheets as usual.
Mr. SPECTER. What was on the stretcher at that time?Auch Tomlinson beschreibt nicht mehr als die Matratze und zwei Laken:
Mr. JIMISON. I noticed nothing more than a little fiat mattress and two sheets as usual.
Mr. SPECTER. And describe the appearance of that stretcher, if you will, please.Somit sagen also alle drei Zeugen übereinstimmend aus, daß auf Connallys Stretcher nicht mehr war als zwei Laken und eine Matratze.
Mr. TOMLINSON. I believe that stretcher had sheets on it and had a white covering on the pad.
Mr. SPECTER. What did you say about the covering on the pad, excuse me?
Mr. TOMLINSON. I believe it was a white sheet that was on the pad.
Mr. SPECTER. And was there anything else on that?
Mr. TOMLINSON. I don't believe there was on that one, I'm not sure, but I don't believe there was.
Mr. SPECTER. And what was on "B", if you recall; if anything?Wie sehen hier sehr schön, wie Specter wieder nach den Dingen fragt, die er am Vortag bei der Befragung Frau Westers herausgefunden hat. Hiermit verrät Specter seine Absichten, er glaubt, wenn Tomlinson beschreibt, daß diese Dinge auf Stretcher B waren, daß er dann Stretcher B Connally zuweisen könnte. Schwerer Fehler - denn wie gesagt, hatte Frau Wester zuvor alle Gegenstände von diesem Stretcher entfernt. :)
Mr. TOMLINSON. Well, at one end they had one or two sheets rolled up; I didn't examine them. They were bloody. They were rolled up on the east end of it and there were a few surgical instruments on, the opposite end and a sterile pack or so.
Mr. SPECTER. A sterile what?
Mr. TOMLINSON. A sterile pack.
Mr. SPECTER. What do you mean by that?
Mr. TOMLINSON. Like gauze or something like that.
Mr. SPECTER. Was there an alcohol sponge?
Mr. TOMLINSON. There could have been.
Mr. SPECTER. Was there a roll of 1-inch tape?
Lambach schrieb:Danke @bredulino für die zusätzlichen Informationen, die sich gut ins Gesamtbild einfügen lassen!... und die groucho monate- oder jahrelang ignorieren wird, weil ich sie gepostet habe und nicht du ;)