Oscar Pistorius, das Model, der Valentinstag und das war dann Notwehr

Dusk schrieb:Mag mir das jmd sagen? Ich weiss nicht, wo man das nachgucken kann.

Fresco has been given immunity by the court from possible prosecution in return for his honesty testimony.
.

In all likelihood, Pistorius will have to take the witness stand.

He is the only living person who truly knows what happened that night.

It is going to be suggested to him

that it is improbable that he would not first have verified Steenkamp’s whereabouts before going after an intruder;

that given his disability it is improbable that he would have gone forward to confront an intruder rather than try and hide from him;

that it is improbable that he would have told the security inspector that things inside his house were “fine”,
unless he had something he wanted to hide;

that it is improbable that Steenkamp would have locked herself in the toilet unless she was trying to escape from him; and so on.

The court will attach considerable weight to the probabilities.

The court is likely to follow the English philosopher Hume’s assertion that the “great a priori improbability of some assertions outweighs the force of testimony otherwise reliable”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...rial-live.html

I noted that the pathologist stood firm on the fact that after the first shots to Reeve (not the head shot) she would still have retained cognitive abilities and would have been able to scream. He said it would be abnormal not to scream, 'flight or fight' I think he said.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237618&page=7

Yes he did lie in his sworn affidavit and took the blame for shooting his gun in the restaurant. Now he has made a plea bargain with the State provided he tells the truth in his testimony in this murder trial.

Nola schrieb:wer legt eigentlich die Reihenfolge der Zeugen fest ? Oder können die willkürlich ausgesucht werden. Wenn die Liste richtig ist, ist z. B Michelle Burger relativ hinten, wurde aber als erste befragt.